DarwinTalk.com Forum Index DarwinTalk.com
Evolution Debate and Public Discussion Forum
 

 FAQFAQ SearchSearch Free GamesMake a Donation  UsergroupsUsergroups Free GamesForum Rules ProfileContact RegisterRegister 
ProfileWebsite News Log inSubmit Articles  ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in 


Spiritual benefits of a belief in evolution/rebirth?



 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DarwinTalk.com Forum Index -> DEBATE - Creation Theory Vs. Evolution Science

evolutionary rebirth, a possible basis for a future faith?
yes
25%
 25%  [ 1 ]
no
75%
 75%  [ 3 ]
possibly
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 4

Author Message
monkeyman-evolving
Not So Newbie



Joined: 03 Nov 2004

Posts: 5

Location: uk

PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:48 pm    Post subject: Spiritual benefits of a belief in evolution/rebirth? Reply with quote

* Rebirth implies that we all stay on this planet, and therefore must learn to get along with each other, and RESPECT THE ENVIRONMENT!

* Evolution is OPTIMISTIC, because (genetic) mistakes are part of the mechanism for progress toward harmony with the environment. The faults are RANDOMLY generated. No guilt, no blame!

*Although the history of evolution can teach us lessons, evolution suggests that there is no single 'right answer' to how to live ones life, in our dynamic world. The basic rules of most religions increase fitness in populations by allow us to get along together, (usually, except when they clash with one another over details it seems!)
Back to top
politas
Tadpole



Joined: 13 Jun 2006

Posts: 23


PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, there is absolutely no evidence for rebirth. This makes it a difficult thing to accept for the sort of rational people who accept evolution.

Secondly, I see little moral basis for such a faith. How does a belief in rebirth lead to a desire to behave well to other people in one's current life?
Back to top
Arthwollipot
Moderator



Joined: 26 Feb 2003

Posts: 1009

Location: Australia

PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, there's the whole karma-reincarnation idea which means that if you behave well in this life you'll be reborn into a better life.

Personally I just don't get this whole evolutionary-rebirth thing. How does rebirth (reincarnation, presumably) fit in with evolution? Sorry, but this seems pretty nonsensical to me.
Back to top
monkeyman-evolving
Not So Newbie



Joined: 03 Nov 2004

Posts: 5

Location: uk

PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm, nonsensical & incompatible with scientifically minded people, an irrational idea. Not an encouraging start for my New Faith!

I accept that ideas like these are in a different category from evidential scientific understanding of our universe, our reality, but I think that science has broadened our potential for understanding 'spiritual', or 'metaphysical' matters. For me, the established scientific ideas of evolution hint at deeper truths about our existence. The way dead physical matter is recycled into new living matter for example. I dont pretend to know anything, I admit, these ideas are just 'faith' for me, but an extension of scientific knowledge that gives me hope and optimism for the future.

As for the moral repurcussions of this idea of 'not going anywhere' when you die, but staying in some way, being reborn onto the surface of this wondrous living planet, well surely the great dictum of Jesus, 'do as you would be done by' would make far more sense, if we all remained in the same location, rather than being transported to some heavenly realm.

Please cast a vote, I am really very curious about how people feel about these ideas. Smile Question
Back to top
Arthwollipot
Moderator



Joined: 26 Feb 2003

Posts: 1009

Location: Australia

PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm. Sorry, but I still don't get it. Evolution simply describes how one species gradually sprouts subspecies, it doesn't say anything about the recycling of organic matter or anything like that. Perhaps you are looking for the "evolutionary cosmology" forum?

The problem with your idea of "being reborn onto the surface of this ... planet" is that it is simply the elements of which one's body is comprised that are recycled. For a real religious idea, there must be some form of "soul" or consciousness which survives death.

Sure, my body will eventually come to make up other living beings - the carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen will be put to other uses. But I don't see anything particularly "spiritual" about it.

If you want to move in that direction, think about the way the atoms which make up our bodies were manufactured billions of years ago in the fiery hearts of supernovas, to be scattered throughout the universe by cataclysmic explosions which make the atomic bomb look like a damp squib. There's a truth to boggle the mind...
Back to top
politas
Tadpole



Joined: 13 Jun 2006

Posts: 23


PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Arthwollipot wrote:
Sure, my body will eventually come to make up other living beings - the carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen will be put to other uses. But I don't see anything particularly "spiritual" about it.


Yeah, like I said. No moral structure to base a religion on. Where is the motivation for good behaviour?

I have a perfectly good rationalist moral structure to explain why behaving nicely to other people is a good idea for me.

You really need to flesh out out your idea more. How do you see one's actions in their current life affecting the future lives which utilise their atoms after they die?
Back to top
skiddum
Pit Bull



Joined: 25 Jan 2005

Posts: 374

Location: FL

PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 6:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

politas wrote:
Yeah, like I said. No moral structure to base a religion on. Where is the motivation for good behaviour?

?

We do what we ought to do, because it is best for us, and for others. It seems simple enough to me?

Why does invoking an immaterial "spirit" change that?

If you want a treatise on ethics that mentions nothing of the afterlife, a god, or a spirit, try utilitarian thinking, egoism, the evolution of social behavior, social contract theory, etc.

Also read Kai Nelson.

Quote:
You really need to flesh out out your idea more. How do you see one's actions in their current life affecting the future lives which utilise their atoms after they die?

What?

What we do has consequences, ripples through time and other individuals and objects. What does this have to do with where the atoms in our body end up? What do you think of the skin cells (and hairs, and etc) you shed every day millions of? Are those atoms significant?

DO you have any evidence for this immaterial "spirit" you seem to hint at?
Back to top
politas
Tadpole



Joined: 13 Jun 2006

Posts: 23


PostPosted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

skiddum wrote:
politas wrote:
Yeah, like I said. No moral structure to base a religion on. Where is the motivation for good behaviour?

?

We do what we ought to do, because it is best for us, and for others. It seems simple enough to me?

Why does invoking an immaterial "spirit" change that?

You're answering the wrong post, I think, and reading exactly opposite meaning in my words from their intention.

I explicitly said that I have perfectly acceptable rational reasons for "good" behaviour.

skiddum wrote:
What we do has consequences, ripples through time and other individuals and objects. What does this have to do with where the atoms in our body end up? What do you think of the skin cells (and hairs, and etc) you shed every day millions of? Are those atoms significant?

That's what I was asking. This "Evolutionistic Rebirth" belief being discussed isn't mine. I'm trying to get an idea about what monkeyman-evolving is actually proposing. So far he's been fairly incoherent.
Back to top
skiddum
Pit Bull



Joined: 25 Jan 2005

Posts: 374

Location: FL

PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

politas wrote:
I'm trying to get an idea about what monkeyman-evolving is actually proposing. So far he's been fairly incoherent.


Sorry. You're right.

Monkeyman, feel free to reply to my points.
Back to top
admin
Beloved Admin



Joined: 28 Sep 2000

Posts: 160

Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Religion once again sprouts it's ugly head into science........
Back to top
Arthwollipot
Moderator



Joined: 26 Feb 2003

Posts: 1009

Location: Australia

PostPosted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 3:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't actually see this particularly as religion - it is a spiritual view of science, and I'd really like monkeyman to come back so that I can actually try and work out what he's trying to get at.
Back to top
The Paladin
House Cat



Joined: 02 May 2005

Posts: 174


PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scientism sprouts its ugly head into religion.
Back to top
Arthwollipot
Moderator



Joined: 26 Feb 2003

Posts: 1009

Location: Australia

PostPosted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 3:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's no reason why science cannot be spiritual. So long as the "spiritual" side focuses on the beholder's sense of awe and wonder, and doesn't bring in any messy non-testable hypotheses like, er... spirits or anything.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DarwinTalk.com Forum Index -> DEBATE - Creation Theory Vs. Evolution Science All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


© 2001-2007